Selling Haunted Houses

Question: Can a seller in Ontario avoid legal trouble if they do not tell the buyer their house is haunted?

Answer: In Ontario, a seller is generally expected to disclose material latent defects that could affect safety, habitability, or create a serious risk to the buyer; a haunted status is not automatically a legal “latent defect,” but repeating rumours without evidence can create legal and negotiation issues, including possible claims if the buyer says they were misled or the property suffered stigma-related harm, so Vagans Legal Paralegal can help by reviewing what you know, what was said during discussions, and how to document proper disclosure and avoid further comments, including for buyers and sellers across Ontario; for help before you say or write anything that could cause problems, call (416) 473-8472. McGrath v. MacLean, 1979 CanLII 1691  

Does the Seller of a House Need to Disclose That the House Is Haunted to the Buyer?

There Are Few Cases Involving Rumoured Haunted Houses; However, It Does Appear That the Manner In Which Rumours Are Spread May Result In Liability For Stating That a House Is Haunted and Thereby Causing a Reduced Property Value.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

The case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, suggests that a seller who jokes about selling a haunted house may be subsequently sued by the buyer for failure to disclose the haunted status.  The buyer, concerned that rumours of the haunted status may cause a stigma with resulting harm in the form of reduced property values and the claim sought compensation for failing to disclosure the haunted status during the sales negotiations.

The Law

On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable.  This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.

In regards to failing to disclose that a house is haunted, in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case, it was determined that whereas the haunted house statements were made jokingly and whereas the buyer was unable to provide proof that the house was haunted, the case was dismissed.  Accordingly, whether would find a seller liable if evidence of paranormal activity was available remains unknown.  Another interesting case involving a haunted house, was the Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which involved allegations of negligence against a newspaper for publishing an article suggesting that a vacant house was haunted and thereby causing a reduction in the property value of the house.

Summary Comment

The chances of getting sued for spreading a rumour that a house is haunted is slim, a former owner of a house should avoid spreading rumours that may adversely affect the value of the property. A seller limits the risk of legal trouble by providing proper disclosure during the selling process and thereafter keeping quiet.