Yes No Share to Facebook
Selling Haunted Houses
Involves Concerns For Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure
Question: Is a seller legally required to disclose if a house is haunted in Canada?
Answer: While no explicit law mandates disclosure of a house being haunted, improperly sharing such rumours can affect property value and lead to potential legal consequences. It is crucial for sellers to disclose known latent defects per McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691. Protect your rights and property value by seeking professional advice through a complimentary consultation at Vagans Legal.
Does the Seller of a House Need to Disclose That the House Is Haunted to the Buyer?
There Are Few Cases Involving Rumoured Haunted Houses; However, It Does Appear That the Manner In Which Rumours Are Spread May Result In Liability For Stating That a House Is Haunted and Thereby Causing a Reduced Property Value.
Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted
The case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, suggests that a seller who jokes about selling a haunted house may be subsequently sued by the buyer for failure to disclose the haunted status. Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.
The Law
On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable. This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.
As for the concern involving failure to disclose that a house is haunted, the court in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case determined that as the statements regarding the haunted status were made jokingly and the Plaintiff was without actual evidence to prove that the house was actually haunted, the case was dismissed. Of course, it is interesting to wonder what the decision of the court would be if some evidence of paranormal activity was available. Another interesting case involving a haunted house, was the Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which involved allegations of negligence against a newspaper for publishing an article suggesting that a vacant house was haunted and thereby causing a reduction in the property value of the house.
Summary Comment
Although the likelihood of being sued for spreading rumours that a house is haunted is unlikely, sellers, among others, are best to avoid the risk of a legal hassle by providing full disclosure when selling a property. Subsequently, avoiding the spread of rumours about the property is wise.
NOTE: A considerable multitude of inquiries pertaining to “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicates a demand for prompt, competent legal representation instead of a particular professional designation. In Ontario, paralegals with licenses are governed by the identical Law Society that regulates lawyers, enabling them to represent clients in specified litigation scenarios. Advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural proficiency are fundamental to that function. Vagans Legal provides legal representation within its licensed boundaries, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and persuasive advocacy designed to secure efficient and advantageous outcomes for clients.
